O 500 Toques faz muito uso de cookies no navegador
Por favor, ative os cookies nas preferências do seu navegador antes de entrar.
Fonte (Imagem): Free Images
Francisco Cesar Pinheiro Rodrigues
Global warming. The Paris Agreement. Should we get out of it?
My
question ? nosy headstrong - was related to the news that in the Antarctic
there was a drop in temperature - the opposite of what is expected - because
there was, and still is, an almost unanimous academic consensus that global
warming is growing dangerously as a consequence of human activity. It was
mandatory, I thought, without imagining the immense complexity of climatology,
a global limitation of industrial activity, livestock, and deforestation and of
everything else which would imply on an increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) in the
atmosphere, even if such a restriction curbs the economic growth of countries
ours included, rated among the ten most polluting countries.
Considering the rise in sea level - allegedly confirmed by the media - to be
one of the serious consequences of the greenhouse effect flooding coastal
areas, I concluded that the anomalous cooling, which occurred in part of the
Antarctica, could be explained by the shift of the Earth's axis enabling the
Sun's rays to warm certain areas while cooling others in the same continent,
depending on the weight of the oceans and the Earth's rotational movement. This
variation - I “deduced“ - would be more noticeable near the Polar
Regions in both hemispheres. Some areas, reiterating, warmer before, would
become colder and vice versa, which would keep the average planetary
temperature unchanged. If for example, winter is harsher in New York, probably
in Siberia, on the opposite side of the planet, winter would be less severe; a
phenomenon little publicized since it occurred in a sparsely inhabited region,
thus not justifying headlines.
I wondered: what could explain this probable mutation of the Earth's axis tilt?
Evaluating with a naked eye, the impressive mass of water of the Oceans on the
globe the conclusion seemed obvious to me: with melting ice at the poles and
peaks on the high mountains, millions of tons of melted ice, notably in the
Antarctica, ended up in the seas and oceans, increasing its level, justifying
the necessity of limitation in the human activity, given as responsible for the
greenhouse effect.
views 199
comentários 0
Deseja comentar essa notÃcia?
Faça login ou crie seu cadastro!!
Últimos comentários
Leis “anti-preconceitos' precisam ser repensadas.
ler mais
views 24
comentários 0
O enforcamento de Saddam.
ler mais
views 30
comentários 0
It?s only logical. The oil spill was a criminal act
ler mais
views 353
comentários 0
